White PapersAll Regime

Investing Across
Regimes

Building portfolios for an uncertain world.

A portfolio should not depend on one macroeconomic forecast being right. It should own several independent return drivers, adapt when regimes change and retain access to explicit protection when ordinary diversification fails.

Published 3 September 2026 · Research and performance data through 31 August 2026

Inflation risingInflation falling
Growth fallingGrowth rising
01 Stagflation Real assets · trend · inflation protection
02 Inflationary expansion Growth · real assets · trend
03 Disinflationary slowdown Quality duration · defensive income · convexity
04 Expansion Productive assets · credit · property
Global Creator B Five-year actual record September 2021–August 2026 · USD
Total return +97.4% Global 60/40: +31.5%
Annualised return 14.6% Global 60/40: 5.6%
Maximum drawdown −14.7% Global 60/40: −23.5%
01

The problem

Traditional diversification

40% in bonds is not always
40% protection.

A 60/40 portfolio is diversified by asset-class label. It is not necessarily diversified by economic risk. Its defensive promise rests heavily on one relationship: when equities fall, bonds should rise.

01

The textbook case

Growth weakens

Equities fall Rates fall Bonds cushion the loss

This is the environment in which 60/40 behaves as expected.

02

The inflation case

Inflation rises

Rates rise Bonds fall Equity valuations compress

The intended diversifier is exposed to the same shock as the growth engine.

03

The consequence

Both sleeves lose together

60%Growth assets 40%Defensive bonds
One shared macroeconomic bet

The portfolio discovers that it was less diversified than it looked.

When inflation was the shock

The weakness is visible in the historical evidence.

These periods do not make 60/40 “wrong”. They show why it should not be treated as a complete answer to every regime.

1972–1979 inflation analogue −3.3%

Global 60/40 real return per annum after inflation

Calendar 2022 −17.4%

Global 60/40 return as equities and bonds declined together

Source: Capicraft calculations. The 1972–1979 figure is a historical inflation-regime analogue; the 2022 figure forms part of the hypothetical systematic comparison. Returns are in USD.

“The problem is not that 60/40 never works. It is that one economic relationship is asked to do too much of the portfolio’s defensive work.”

Start with economic regimes

Do not predict one future.
Prepare for several.

The All Regime approach begins with the direction of economic growth and inflation. The map is a portfolio-design tool, not a forecasting model. The question is whether the portfolio has credible sources of return if the future differs materially from the recent past.

01

Growth

Productive assets remain core long-term return generators, but they should not be responsible for virtually all portfolio return.

Equities · selected property · enterprise value
02

Defensive income

High-quality fixed income can provide liquidity and recession protection, but remains sensitive to inflation and starting yields.

High-quality bonds · cash · contractual income
03

Real assets

Scarcity, replacement cost and monetary conditions introduce economic drivers that differ from conventional financial assets.

Precious metals · energy · infrastructure · commodities
04

Diversifiers

Trend, relative value and selected alternatives can contribute returns less dependent on growth and discount-rate outcomes.

Trend · relative value · selected alternatives

A three-layer architecture

Static diversification is the start.
It is not the whole answer.

Even a well-diversified starting portfolio can be wrong. Trend and convexity add two different forms of adaptation.

1

Static diversification

What if our macro forecast is wrong?

Own genuinely different economic drivers.
2

Dynamic adaptation

What if the starting portfolio is wrong?

Allow exposure to change as persistent trends emerge.
3

Convex protection

What if markets move too quickly or violently?

Retain exposure capable of responding to extreme stress.

The five-year record

The systematic anchor.
The active expression.

All Regime is the investable systematic anchor; Global Creator is the active expression. Creator can depart from the anchor through valuation, positioning, security selection and the cost of protection.

Flexibility without an anchor becomes drift. An anchor without flexibility becomes dogma.

Growth of USD 100 from September 2021 to August 2026 for Global Creator B, two hypothetical All Regime models and global 60/40.
Creator B: actual USD performance; no management or performance fee, but after transaction, administration and other fund expenses. Comparators: hypothetical monthly-rebalanced systematic calculations. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.
What the record shows

Better compounding with a shallower month-end drawdown

USD 100 grew to USD 197.4 in Creator B versus USD 131.5 in global 60/40. The realised record is economically meaningful, but it does not suggest that discretion removes risk.

What it does not show

No portfolio leads in every environment

Creator realised more volatility than the systematic models. Protection has a cost, trend can struggle in reversals and broad diversification can lag a concentrated growth portfolio in benign regimes.

From model to portfolio

Why Global Creator is not simply a static balanced fund

The systematic framework makes the economic risks explicit and repeatable. Creator adds active judgement around that anchor.

  • ValuationAn attractive asset class is not attractive at any price.
  • PositioningCrowding, correlations, liquidity and embedded factor risk matter.
  • Security selectionIdiosyncratic opportunities can complement broad allocation decisions.
  • Risk managementGross exposure, hedges and protection can change with the opportunity set.

These are potential sources of value, not guaranteed alpha. Discretion can also detract when judgements are wrong.

Systematic anchor

All Regime

Liquid building blocks
Rules-based construction
Explicit portfolio roles

valuation · regime · opportunity
Active expression

Global Creator

Position sizing
Security selection
Dynamic risk management

11

The objective

Better compounding through changing environments.

We cannot know with confidence whether the coming decade will resemble the 2010s, the 1970s, a post-war financial-repression environment or something investors have not yet experienced. A successful portfolio should not require us to know.

Avoid permanent loss Maintain liquidity Retain the ability to rebalance Remain invested

Read the research

Investing Across Regimes

The complete 19-page paper sets out the historical context, portfolio architecture, systematic evidence, stress periods, inflation analogue and the relationship between All Regime and Global Creator.

Capicraft White Paper · 3 September 2026 · PDF